Thursday, December 15, 2016

Baron G58 Electrical System

The November issue of the American Bonanza Society Magazine's BPPP column detailed the unique G36 Bonanza electrical system. Although the G58 Baron’s panel looks essentially identical to the G36, the electrical system behind it is substantially different even from that of its single-engine stablemate. This article was published in the December issue of the American Bonanza Society magazine - www.bonanza.org

Multiengine aircraft are typically thought of as being safer than singles because they have an extra engine. But this issue is often debated. Ask a group of pilots whether two engines are better than one and you may hear some use the phrase “the good engine will take you to the scene of the crash,” while others maintain that continual training on engine-out procedures is essential to realizing the safety of engine redundancy.

While a second powerplant is the most obvious advantage of flying a Baron, there is more to redundancy than just the engine. One such example is the electrical system. Some single-engine aircraft are equipped with redundant electrical systems, but as discussed in my November 2016 BPPP column, even an aircraft such as the G36 Bonanza can’t provide total redundancy in the case of a main alternator failure. The availability of a second engine to drive a full-size, second alternator, and room and weight-carrying capability to host a full-size second battery, permits a fully redundant electrical system in the G58 Baron.

G58 Electrical System 


The G58 electrical system consists of two independent systems, each powered by its own 13 amp-hour battery and 100-amp alternator. The alternators are gear driven and attached to each engine ahead of the right, forward cylinder. Each alternator provides power to its respective buss, with power equipment that generally have a “left” or “right” oriented purpose. For example, the left buss normally powers items such as the left engine’s fuel boost pump or the left engine’s starter relay. The HOT BATTERY BUSS is powered by the right electrical system and generally consists of equipment that requires power while the aircraft is shut down, such as the courtesy lights and the clock. There are many systems that don’t have a left or right designation, and there are no cockpit indications that show which piece of equipment is powered by which buss. So it would be wise to study Section 7 of the Pilots Operating Handbook, where you will see charts illustrating equipment and their relationship to each buss.

Busses Tied Relay 


The G58 handles electrical loads and routing of power differently than older Barons when there is a malfunction or alternator failure. In the event of an alternator failure, the operating alternator is able to support the load of the whole electrical system, although this does not happen automatically. If one of the alternators, voltage regulators, or current limiters fail, or any number of abnormal or emergency conditions exists where one of the busses is affected, that alternator must be manually switched to the Buss Tied position to allow power to flow from the other alternator. If you have a situation that requires a shutdown of the left engine, for example, you will need to move the left alternator switch to the Buss Tied position. This enables current to flow from the right alternator to the left buss. The buss tie relay will engage and the left and right busses will connect together so the remaining alternator can power the entire electrical system. A BUSS TIE indicator will illuminate on the G1000 panel indicating this condition.

This process is quite different than the G36 Bonanza’s function. As I wrote in the November issue, it’s normal and expected to see the BUSS TIE annunciator on the ground in a G36, but this would indicate a system failure in a G58. In pre-G58 Barons with alternators, the left and right alternators are tied together to the same buss. If there is an alternator failure in pre-G58 Barons, no action is required by the pilot to maintain electrical continuity. As already noted, in a G58 the pilot must manually tie the busses if one alternator fails. There is one scenario in which the buss tie relay will engage automatically: application of external power to the aircraft while on the ground. Once external power is applied, the buss tie relay connects both left and right systems together so that power can be delivered to both buses.

Failure Scenarios 


The most obvious situation requiring the alternator to be switched to the buss tie position is engine failure. The windmilling propeller will continue to allow the alternator to produce electrical power, but once the engine is secured and the propeller feathered, the alternator should be switched to the buss tie position so power can be made available by the operating alternator. Other situations that may require the busses to be tied are:
  • Precautionary shutdown of the electrical system (erratic voltage or amperage indications from the alternator)
  • A voltage regulator shutdown (overvoltage or undervoltage)
  • The alternator not delivering enough amperage
There may be other scenarios, so an in-depth ground session with your instructor to explore these further would be worthwhile.

Summary 


The G58 Baron can provide total redundancy to the various electrical busses if there is an alternator failure or precautionary shut down. When transitioning to the G58 from an older Baron or a Bonanza, it is imperative for the pilot to have a full understanding of the electrical system. It is also important to cover the differences between the G58 and the other aircraft a pilot is transitioning from. Exploring various failure scenarios with your instructor will help identify appropriate reactions to various situations. Make sure you find an instructor that is well versed in the systems of the G58 Baron. There are many BPPP instructors that are qualified in the G58, and it will be time well spent.

Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Understanding the Bonanza G36 Electrical System

The following article was published in the November 2016 issue of the American Bonanza Society magazine - www.bonanza.org

As an aircraft owner, maintenance issues are bound to arise. When you factor in Murphy’s Law, you will eventually find yourself at an unfamiliar airport talking to a mechanic who may not necessarily be intimately familiar with your aircraft. Because of the popularity of the Bonanza, many mechanics have worked on one at one point, so chances are they can help with many issues that have you stranded away from home.  But what about problems that aren’t so cut and dried?  Understanding the systems on your specific aircraft will help guide the conversation with the mechanic, and possibly save you a lot of headaches.

One of my clients had just taken delivery of a G36 Bonanza and arranged to take it to an avionics shop to have the G1000 panels updated.  Everything seemed normal as we taxied out to the runup area.  Once we started the Before Takeoff checklist, however, we quickly found out that Alternator 1 was not functioning properly. We reluctantly taxied back to the ramp.  It appeared the shop’s technician was somewhat knowledgeable about late model Bonanzas, because he was aware that there were two alternators installed in the aircraft.  However, when discussing the symptoms he made a comment about swapping the alternators to help decide whether it was really the alternator at fault.

It was clear to me that he didn’t have an understanding of the G36 electrical system, which is completely different from any other Bonanza.  I had a brief conversation with him to help shed light on a unique system for a single-engine general aviation aircraft. The G36 does have two alternators. But they are quite different from each other and serve very different functions.   The G36 has two electrical busses, or distribution systems, normally powered by the alternators independently. It also has two batteries, one for each electrical buss.

Alternator 1 and the BUSSES TIED condition 


Alternator 1 is traditional in that it can deliver 100 amps of power to the airplane’s entire electrical system at about 700 or more engine RPM.  While on the ground it does exactly that. This is validated by the Before Taxi checklist as you look for ZERO LOAD on Alternator 2.   The two busses are tied together by a relay. When Alternator 2 is not working you will notice the BUSSES TIED annunciator illuminated on the G1000. This means Alternator 1 is providing power to everything. The checklist reminds you to check for the proper illumination of this annunciator. When the busses are tied together, there are current blocking diodes that isolate Battery 2 from providing power to Buss 1.  A typical current-blocking diode provides a pathway for electrical current to pass only in one direction. Because of the electrical properties of the diode, the electricity that traverses it experiences a drop of approximately two volts.  This is why you see a different voltage range when checking the voltage of Buss 2 in the Before Taxi Checklist than you do in flight.  You can see this isolation demonstrated by turning off Battery 1 and Alternator 1 and observing that Buss 2 still has voltage, but Buss 1 does not. Reversing this scenario with Battery 1 and Alternator 1 switched on, and Battery 2 and Alternator 2 switched off, you will see that Buss 2 still gets voltage because of the buss tie relay.

Alternator 2 


Alternator 2 is a much smaller alternator rated at 20 amps. This factory-installed unit is the same B&C Specialties unit that is sold as an aftermarket backup alternator in pre-2000 Bonanzas (the B&C became standard equipment in A36s that year). Alternator 2 will start to deliver power to Buss 2 when the output of Alternator 2 is above 2.8 amps, which occurs when the engine reaches about 2000 RPM.  Once this happens, the buss tie relay opens, the current blocking diodes are taken out of the circuit, the BUSSES TIED annunciator extinguishes, and the two busses become separate and independent operating electrical systems.  Alternator 1 along with Battery 1 powers Buss 1. Alternator 2 along with Battery 2 powers Buss 2. The voltage on Buss 2 shows a normal operating range since the buss is now getting its power from Alternator 2 without going through the current limiting diodes. This is the normal operating condition. It continues this way until either (1) the engine drops below 1800 RPM; or (2) Alternator 2 output drops below 2 amps.  

Why this unique system? 


Why engineer a system that functions this way?  A look at the equipment that is powered by each buss will help answer this question.  Reviewing the list of equipment on Buss 2, you will find that much of it is essential for safe flight while IFR. If there were ever a problem with Alternator 1 or an issue with any equipment attached to Buss 1, it is reassuring to know that Buss 2 can operate essential equipment completely independently.  This is not to say that a failure of Alternator 1 will be a non-event or that disabling Buss 1 will go without consequence.  If you don’t have power on Buss 1, a number of important things will no longer function, such as the landing gear motor.  It is important to review this list of equipment so that you know what to expect. You might want to tab it in your POH binder (Section III, pages 3-12) so you can find it for a quick review in the event of Alternator 1 failure in flight. It is prudent to also understand how aftermarket additions such as tip tank fuel transfer pumps and various anti-ice systems function in the event of Buss 1 shutdown.  For that you’ll need to check the POH Supplement for the modification or ask the STC holder. As advances in avionics continue, electrical systems evolve and increase in complexity.  It’s up to the pilot to be aware of as many scenarios as possible so that proper troubleshooting can be performed if an issue arises.  The alerts generated by the electrical system and possible equipment failures in the G36 Bonanza could leave an unknowledgeable pilot vulnerable. Having complete knowledge of the electrical system is important in knowing how to manage equipment in normal, abnormal, and emergency conditions, and to understand how these failures will affect the rest of your flight.  This knowledge will also pay dividends when you find yourself at an unfamiliar airport talking with a mechanic about the unique electrical system of the G36.


Thursday, October 6, 2016

Leave your iPad at home

I do a lot of training for pilots that are looking to transition to a Bonanza or Baron.  Often times, the transition is from smaller aircraft that may not be in the high-performance or complex category, but sometimes it will be a lateral move.  For most pilots, the transition is not very complicated - a review of the systems, differences between their old aircraft, and the new one, and flight time can get the pilot up to speed.

It always concerns me when the first 10 minutes of the first flight with a pilot turns into working on mounting the iPad, and routing the wires.  I love the iPad, and I absolutely love ForeFlight and some of the other apps out there for the Android.  Its hard to believe the capability we get as pilots for such a cheap price, but it has its place.


The first flight in the Bonanza will be focused on pre-flight, ground operations, take-off, climb, air-work, cruise considerations, descent, pattern entry, and landings.  Notice, there will be nothing that involves the iPad, and it quite frankly just gets in the way and acts as a distraction.  I'd much rather not have it installed on the yoke for the first flight.  You will need to get acclimated with switch location, instrument indications and gear indicators that may become hidden with most iPad mounts.

The only time an iPad in the cockpit makes sense for initial check out is if there is a Stratus unit available.  Ill have my iPad with me, and will be connecting to your Stratus, or Stratusx/Flightbox, so you still don't need to worry about the iPad until we start doing instrument procedures, or cross countries.

I do understand the excitement - I really do. Owning your first Bonanza is an amazing experience, and I get that you want to get all of the goodies installed in the aircraft.  Ultimately, you will want to get the installation all squared away, but for the first flight, just know - it will be mostly useless.

Wednesday, September 28, 2016

Bonanza G36 Dual Bus System

About a month ago, I had an instance where a student of mine had an alternator failure in his G36 Bonanza at our destination.  We ultimately determined that the number one alternator needed to be repaired or overhauled, but not before a conversation with the mechanic ensued that caused me to raise an eyebrow. The mechanic, who was not totally familiar with the Bonanza, said to me that he wanted to take the number two alternator and swap it with the number one alternator just to see if it was an alternator issue. That was the red flag that caused me to realize that he didn't understand the electrical system and prompted me to think a about how I should explain the electrical system and some of the differences a pilot will need to consider when transitioning into the G36 Bonanza.  An article on this will appear in the November 2016 issue of the American Bonanza Society's magazine.

Wednesday, August 31, 2016

Garmin 430 and 530 basics

Some may find it hard to believe, but I still run across pilots that have no experience with the Garmin 430 and 530 equipment.  Not that everyone has experience with these systems, but with the proliferation of these units through the early 2000's, most pilots know what they are, and have likely been in an aircraft with one installed.

These pieces of equipment have been out for quite some time, but there are still pilots that are just starting to think about getting a GPS in their aircraft, and these units provide probably the lowest cost of entry these days that will allow a pilot to get a great moving map GPS that can be approved for IFR approaches.

I put together a quick cheat sheet for the first time pilot that wants to just fly their aircraft and get used to the functions of the GPS.

Communication Side----------------Navigation Side

Setup Navigation to an airport
  • Press “Direct To” Button
  • Use the knobs to enter the airport identifier
    •  Each airport starts with a K
    •  No “K” if the airport has a number in it. (ie. C09)
    • The large knob moves the cursor
    •  The small knob makes letters
  • Press Enter TWICE

Find Nearest airports (In an emergency)
  • Rotate the large knob on the right side - all the way to the right until you see NEAREST

Reset unit to default screen
  • Press and hold the CLR button
  • Rotate little knob on the right, one click to the right

Thursday, August 25, 2016

Scheduler Function on Garmin 430/530

Ive been in enough aircraft to know that this function is starting to get a lot of attention, but there are still times where I fly with folks that have no idea what this is, or what it is about.

In the Garmin 430/530 navigators, there is a scheduler function that allows you to set up a recurring message (Alarm) that pops up at a certain interval. I love to use this function to help remind pilots to change tanks.  The Garmin 430 and 530 manual specifically uses this as an example when setting up scheduled tasks.  I know some pilots that use this to remind them of an oil change, transponder testing, and even BFR and medical!

Check out page 157 of the Garmin 430W manual. (Its PDF page 167 in the following download).
A copy of the manual can be found on the Garmin website, or here: http://www.takewinginc.com/documents/GNS430W_PilotGuideandReference.pdf

 

Thursday, August 18, 2016

The castering nose-wheel

I do a lot of Beechcraft transition training - mostly in the Bonanza.  Over the past two years, I've had three pilots come to me for transition training where there previous aircraft had a castering nose wheel, such as the Cirrus or the Grumman American Tiger.

I've noticed that pilots transitioning from an aircraft with a castering nose wheel have a hard time breaking the habit of using differential braking for turning.  This can be caught by the instructor by keeping their toes on the pedals to determine whether they are being used for steering, or whether the brakes are being applied.  An experienced instructor will be able to tell this right away.  The thought is to save on brakes while taxiing.

Another item of interest is the use of brakes on take-off in a Cirrus or Grumman.  I see this happen all the time and I personally think this is bad technique.  Once you get rolling, you should have enough rudder authority to counteract the wind (to an extent) once you get rolling.  The Bonanza has very effective brakes - attempting to correct directional control while heading down the runway is a recipe for disaster.


Thursday, July 14, 2016

Independent Instructors and the TSA


One day I received a letter from the TSA (Transportation and Security Administration). It seemed innocent enough - they wanted to have me call their offices to schedule an in person review of my flight instructor records. At first, I didn't really think anything of it since I keep pretty good records and had been instructing for quite a few years at the time, but for some reason something just didn't feel right, so I telephoned the AOPA legal services division to see if they had ever come across anyone receiving letters like this. They said that they have not, but they didnt think it would be anything to be concerned about since there have been rumors of Independent flight instructors being reviewed by the TSA.

Shortly after the attack on the World Trade Center in 2001, the TSA was formed and so were requirements for flight instructors.  Many of these requirements and procedures concern themselves with foreign citizens looking to get their pilot certificate or advanced ratings, however there are record-keeping requirements and a procedural nuance requiring all flight instructors to capture information from new students even as citizens of the United States.

I set up a date and time to meet with the TSA inspector at my local airport. There was a little bit of confusion, since I live in Indiana, but instruct out of Illinois based airports. The TSA agent said he was not able to come to an Illinois airport because it was out of his jurisdiction and we had to meet him in Indiana based airport, which I thought was strange, so I arranged to meet him at an airport in Indiana about 20 minutes from my home.

The meeting started off good.  He asked me if he could see my logbook to which I declined stating that I keep all of my records of students in a separate file. I showed him the file and the appropriate TSA sign-offs for all of my students.  He wanted to see the copies of my student's passports and I told him that I did not retain them since I didn’t want the liability if these records were lost or stolen.  He told me that it was required, but I challenged him to show me the requirement in the regulation.  He said he would get back to me, which he never did. He then asked to see my proof of my annual TSA training, so I did show him those, but I only had three past years of evidence. During the question and answer, one of the questions that he asked was on record-keeping requirements for the TSA, which I thought was 3 years, but that is actually for the FAA requirement for CFI record keeping, not TSA.... Which is 5 years.  He marked this in his ledger.  I told him that I had lost the other 2 years of evidence, but I certainly did take them and could probably provide evidence that I had paid for them through the American flyers program, which he had never heard of.  He also asked to see my initial training certificate which, luckily I had taped in the back page of my logbook many years ago when the TSA requirements started. I didn't think we needed to keep records of that, since the record keeping requirement was only 5 years for them.

The agent became a little agitated and proceeded to tell me that not complying with the TSA requirements could result in a $19k fine, but he was willing to let me off with a warning and that I needed to be reevaluated after 6 months. 

Six months came along with a phone call from the same TSA agent. I told him over the phone beforehand that I hadn't had any new students in the six months prior, but he wanted to meet anyway.  The second meeting was a waste of time. He asked for my logbook again and I declined again stating that I showed him all of my records already and they are still current.  I basically watched him fill out paperwork and we said our good bye, but not before he mentioned that he will be checking in with me in another 6 months. 

I then did some research and called the TSA offices downstate and was able to get a TSA Supervisor.  I politely mentioned to the TSA Supervisor that considering I do instruction for very few students that meet the requirements of 49 CFR 1552.3, I think the inspection requirements are a little unfounded.  The result of the conversation was that I submitted an affidavit to the TSA stating that I no longer provide any training as described in 49 CFR 1552.3 which includes training toward an initial pilot certificate, an instrument rating, or a multi-engine add on.

Admittedly, this was all done out of frustration, but in reality, I was at a point in my instructor career where I only had a few students that were going for ratings, and this gave me the opportunity to focus on specialized instruction and leave the instruction for ratings to the folks that do it all of the time and are likely a lot better than me at making sure all of the nuances of sending someone for a rating are met.  A fringe benefit was that I dropped student pilot training from my liability insurance and saw a drop in premiums.

The moral of this story is that the TSA is ramping up efforts to identify independent instructors and review their paperwork.  More often than not, I am sure the experience will be a good one, but for me it was a challenge.  The silver lining was that I was able to focus my efforts on a different side of instruction.

Wednesday, February 17, 2016

Com 3??

As an instructor, there are many times where you just want to mute the radios, or quickly shut off what's happening on the frequency. Most of the time with older radios your only option is to use the volume knob, or the switching panel to switch off the audio coming from the radios.
I've been using a new trick on some of the new Garmin switching panels, which is to press the COM3 button. Since most aircraft that I fly and don't have a COM3, the button is not wired to anything and it is a quick way to shut off all communications and all radios without messing with the volume knobs or the switching panel.